Automation and AI - Half of Australia remains unconvinced

Clarke McEwan Accountants



Many businesses are now embracing automation and artificial intelligence, but the benefits of these technologies are getting lost on many customers and staff.

The research, conducted by Nature on behalf of SEEK, found that less than half of Australians view automation and artificial intelligence (AI) as being "probably a good thing" (48 per cent and 46 per cent, respectively).

Of those that do, the main benefits were identified as increased efficiencies (47 per cent), less repetitiveness (46 per cent) and freeing up people's time (35 per cent).

Surprisingly, it was not just younger adults who are more receptive to these technologies and more positive about their impacts: Baby Boomers (those aged 55 to 64 years), combined with Generation Z (those aged 18 to 24) were more receptive than any other age groups.

Attitudes towards AI and automation were also split by gender, with males much more accepting of the technologies and the belief they deliver greater free time for individuals as well as broader efficiencies for the overall economy than females.

According to the research, a major barrier to even greater uptake of these technologies in business is simply education: people are aware that the technologies exist, but they know little about how they work and what they can be used for. And it is this lack of awareness that is driving a reluctance to accept them.

While 93 per cent of those polled had heard of both AI and automation, three in 10 said they are not welcoming of AI into the workplace. In fact, a quarter of respondents (26 per cent) believe that AI will actually do more harm than good and can't understand the hype about it. That was more than double the 11 per cent who said they love it and think it should be embraced as much as possible.

Job security fears drive concerns about tech

Aside from education, the research found that fears around job security are a major factor in distrust or apprehension of automation and AI.

Despite being among the greatest believers in these technologies, members of Generation Z are also most concerned about their impacts on the availability of future employment opportunities.

That was despite just 6 per cent of respondents having been made redundant or forced to change jobs as a direct result of either AI or automation. These fears are seeing many people turning to training and education, with 41 per cent believing they will need to learn new skills as a direct result of technological advancements.

Fears 'understandable'

Commenting on the findings, Inna Wahlberg, general manager at payroll software provider Ascender Asia Services, said that "it's understandable employees are nervous about advancements when it comes to AI".

"The technology will introduce incredible technical efficiency and get smarter over time, with many suggesting it will replace humans," Ms Wahlberg told My Business.

"However, it could not possibly replace humans completely. For example, while AI may give you the data and analytics to justify a pay increase, would you want to negotiate salary with a robot? When employees have sensitive inquiries, such as queries around payroll, they want to talk to a real person. We are emotional beings and require support from other humans. No matter how sophisticated a chatbot is, we will never truly relate to them."

According to Ms Wahlberg, businesses looking to embrace AI and automation need to understand their core function, which is to "make independent decisions to achieve a goal without continued human input".

"This will put them in a good position to use AI software (when it does become available) to further streamline mundane tasks, and to ensure problems within the organisation that will always require a human touch are identified as soon as possible," the GM said.

Ms Wahlberg agreed that education about the technologies, as well as their benefits and limitations, is the key to driving uptake and usage.

"It is a case of being informed but not alarmed. Businesses will inevitably become more automated and AI will enhance the technological capabilities of software. But it is still a long way off from replacing humans," the GM said.

"For managers and businesses looking to take advantage of AI, it is crucial to build it up gradually. That means learning what tasks AI could help us to achieve in the future and understanding where we can add further value to the business."

The SEEK-Nature research was conducted by interviewing 400 Australian adults aged 18 to 64 currently in the workforce, whether employed or looking for work.

By Clarke McEwan September 1, 2026
At the Federal Budget in May 2026, the Government announced that it would reintroduce a loss carry back tax offset for companies, providing a crucial buffer to any business facing difficult trading conditions.
By Clarke McEwan August 30, 2026
Tax Time 2026 is in full swing, and with that comes a decision for anyone who uses their car for work purposes: is it better to claim a deduction using the logbook or cents per kilometre method? When can I claim car expenses? Broadly, tax deductions for car expenses (i.e. the costs you incur to own and operate a car) are available where you use your car for work-related trips, such as for travel between workplaces or to perform your work duties. The exception is ordinary commuting to and from work - such expenses cannot typically be claimed, as they’re considered private expenses. Cents per kilometre method The cents per kilometre method allows you to claim a fixed rate for each work-related kilometre you travel, up to a maximum of 5,000 km each year. This fixed rate per km covers all of your car expenses for a year, including decline in value, registration and insurance, maintenance, repairs and fuel costs. For the 2025-26 tax year, the rate of deduction is 88 cents per kilometre, which means this tax time, the maximum potential amount of deduction is $4,400. (And keep in mind that the rate of deduction has been increased to 91 cents per km as of 1 July 2026, meaning a total potential deduction of $4,550 in the 2026-27 tax year). One of the benefits of using the cents per kilometre method is that it’s relatively simple, as you don’t need to keep receipts for your fuel or car expenses. However, you do need to keep records to show how you’ve calculated your work-related kilometres (for example, a diary), and you also need to be able to show that you own the car you’re using for work. Logbook method If you have a lot of work-related car expenses and have the time, you might find that the logbook method gives you the best deduction. The logbook method allows you to claim the work-related portion of your actual car expenses. This means that you can claim for a percentage of the actual expenses incurred on running costs such as fuel, electricity, servicing, registration, insurance and the decline in value, provided you’ve used the car in the course of your work. However, as the potential deductions under the logbook method are higher, there are stricter record-keeping requirements to meet. This includes keeping a logbook, which allows the calculation of how much you can claim back, it must: - cover at least 12 continuous weeks and be broadly representative of your travel, - include the reason and purpose, as well as the destination of every work-related journey, - the odometer reading at the start and end of each journey, - and the total kilometres travelled on the journey, - include odometer readings for the start and end of the logbook period and the total kilometres travelled during that period. Each journey in your logbook must be made at the end of the journey or as soon as possible afterwards. If you don't have a valid logbook, then unfortunately you cannot use the logbook method to claim car expenses, although the cents per km method may be available instead. Which is better? The answer to whether you should choose the logbook or cents per km method is very dependent on your personal situation. If you have light work-related car use and don’t love keeping extensive records, the cents per km method may be better suited to your needs, while those who use their car for work frequently may receive a higher deduction under the logbook method. If you’re unsure which method is best for you, speak to a member of our team today.
Why Allied Health Practices Need an Accountant Who Actually Understands Allied Health
By Clarke McEwan August 19, 2026
Why Allied Health Practices Need an Accountant Who Actually Understands Allied Health
Medical Practice Accounting for Practice Owners & Groups
By Clarke McEwan August 17, 2026
Medical Practice Accounting for Practice Owners & Groups
Running a successful medical practice requires more than delivering excellent patient care.
By Clarke McEwan August 11, 2026
Running a successful medical practice requires more than delivering excellent patient care. Strong financial management is essential for maintaining profitability, supporting growth, meeting compliance obligations, and ensuring the long-term sustainability of the practice.
By Clarke McEwan August 10, 2026
To ensure passage of the negative gearing and CGT discount changes that were announced in the May 2026 Federal Budget the Government agreed to make amendments to the SMSF borrowing rules. SMSFs are able to borrow in restricted circumstances which includes borrowing under a limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRBA) to purchase a single acquirable asset. While there have previously been no specific legislative restrictions on the type of asset a SMSF can borrow to purchase, most commonly we see LRBAs being used to purchase property. Up until this point, this could have been any type of real property. These amendments will mean that when SMSF trustees wish to borrow to purchase a property, it must meet the business real property (BRP) definition. This BRP definition relates to usage of the property rather than zoning or what the property was originally built for. This change became law on 26 June 2026, but the Bill includes a 45 day transitional period which will finish on 10 August 2026. This transitional period may allow for arrangements that are currently being implemented on non-BRP assets to be allowable under the new rules where settlement occurs after 10 August 2026, provided the arrangement to purchase the property was entered into on or before 10 August 2026. We recommend that SMSF trustees who are currently implementing LRBA arrangements on non-BRP assets seek specialist SMSF legal advice to ensure their arrangements meet these transitional rules. While this change has been referred to in the media as a ban on super funds borrowing to purchase residential property, the use of the BRP definition makes the change slightly more complex than this. As this definition relates to usage of the property, it is possible that some residentially designed properties could meet the BRP definition (for example, a medical practice that operates from a residentially designed terrace dwelling). The BRP definition also requires that the property is wholly and exclusively used for business purposes. This could mean that some properties that may initially appear to be commercial in nature may not meet the BRP definition (for example, a mixed use residential and retail property on a single title). We recommend that SMSF trustees entering into new LRBAs seek advice from specialist legal and financial advisers to ensure the new requirements are met. Existing arrangements The updated rules allow for existing LRBAs over non-BRP assets to continue. They also allow for existing arrangements to be refinanced, subject to lender availability and approval. For any further information please contact our office.
More Posts